What is the difference between fiscal and social conservatism

A fiscally conservative, socially liberal platform is the best option we have to make the United States a better country for everyone. Born out of a need to oppose the Soviets after World War 2, the United States took the role of world police, ensuring global trade could flourish without issue.

While many countries may benefit from our protection, other nations do not, and arguably the United States is included in the latter group as our economy does not heavily rely on trade. The fiscal conservative wishes to withdraw from this role because of the sheer scope of the cost, and the social liberal wishes to withdraw from this role because of the negative externalities.

One can hold both views without being contradictory. Drug prices are notoriously high in the United States, even though the US is responsible for the most innovation of new drugs. Many countries abroad can provide these drugs for much cheaper, while the US is held back by an ineffective patent law system.

Scaling back patent restrictions allows markets in drug prices to operate much more effectively, and it allows folks with a critical need for various drugs to purchase them with dignity. The fiscal conservative wishes to ease laws and regulations governing our markets, and the social liberal wishes to give more purchasing power to vulnerable members of our society. Our policy on drug prohibition has proven to be a massive failure, and it has cost the United States an estimated trillion dollars since The impact has also seen the breakdown of various communities via the opioid and crack epidemics, the stalling of mental health research, and an exploded prison population.

The fiscal conservative wishes to stop wasting money on ineffective prohibition policies, and the social liberal wishes to reduce the prison population of marginalized communities. The United States is slowly becoming more unified on the idea that climate change is indeed a man-made phenomenon, although I will concede there is more resistance on the political right.

There are plenty of solutions for climate change that fiscal conservatives could support, including a revenue neutral carbon tax regarded by economists as one of the most effective solutions to fighting climate change , an end to oil subsidies 20 billion a year in the US we could save , or a revenue neutral land value tax Henry George was one of the most influential progressive thinkers in the late 19th century, and his ideas have been promoted by notable conservatives like Milton Friedman.

The fiscal conservative wishes to replace inefficient taxes with more efficient taxes that promote sustainable use of our natural resources, and the social liberal wishes to minimize our impact on the environment. Every single year, we pay around billion dollars to service our national debt. What would this country be capable of if we had an extra thousand dollars for every US citizen every year? We may have different ideas on how to spend this money, but fiscal conservatives and social liberals should be able to agree that the scope of our national debt is a long term issue for the nation.

The fiscal conservative wishes to stop wasting money on interest paid out to service our national debt, and the social liberal wishes to have more funds available to invest in our people. In doing so, you will realize that fiscal conservatives are not the apathetic, self-centered demons that many leftists may claim us to be. We can still care about social issues, and we have a lot of data-driven, market oriented solutions to bring to the table that are often overlooked.

The political spectrum is much more complex than just a quadrant, let alone one single line. Ne Raw Apr 4, at pm. Clifton Gordon Mar 17, at pm. Good Morning Ms- Mr. What do you think about the United States Military spending more than double the amount of money on weapons than the next 14 countries in the world combined? I am a fiscal conservative so naturally I am opposed to the government telling businesses how much they have to pay workers. William Feb 2, at am.

Liberal policy suggests band-aids not cures. Education is the most glaring sickness govt corruption notwithstanding this nation knows. Scott Feb 1, at am.

In my mind, any form of government must operate with the long term in mind. That is conservative thinking. Our government is not just for me, it is for all of us. It is not conservative to allow poor children to live in squalor, for my own benefit. It is conservative thinking, to invest in people to provide the greatest return in output of those people, for my own gain. Short-sitedness, cannot be considered conservative.

The ideology is akin to biting off ones nose to spite their face. People, are investments. They are investments that help all of us do better. In terms of environment, destroying it to save a buck with no thought to the future, cannot be considered conservative. In short, the modern democrat is much more conservative than a Republican. John Vincent Jan 11, at pm. I enjoyed this article and am curious of your opinion. In brief, I feel it is important to be fiscally conservative at the state and federal level on a day to day basis in order to be able to act on social issues when they arise.

An extreme case that is prevalent now is the topic of stimulus checks. If our federal government had a balanced budget or even operated with a surplus when COVID 19 hit, it would have been to my mind an easy decision to spend trillions of dollars on a real stimulus package for those in need.

The fiscal conservative in me makes sure we have our basic needs met — food, housing, etc — as well as a rainy day fund. Last spring our furnace died and I was able to pay cash for a repair. From the socially liberal stand point, extra money or resources we have can go to helping others via things like donations, greater than average tips if we do curbside pickup or the rare case that we have dinner at a restaurant, so one and so forth. Search this site Submit Search. The Berkeley Beacon.

Graduate program pushes T advertising campaign. Student turnout soared in election, study finds. Pooled testing model draws mixed reactions among students. College endowment balloons amid pandemic. Emerson senior elected as town councilor.

Lens: The night Michelle Wu was elected mayor of Boston. Fire alarm briefly closes testing center again. Presidential Working Group sends final report to Pelton. Title IX working group takes questions before finalizing recommendations. Title IX working group presents minimal changes in second draft of recommendations. Everything you need to know about the updated Title IX policy. Alum Jackson Davis terminated from NowThis after investigation into sexual misconduct allegations.

As a result, states turn to far more regressive fees and fines to supplement their revenue. Traffic tickets, court fees, and the like play a crucial role in the revenue of states, counties, and municipalities. With these limits on state and local deductions, state and local governments are forced to rely even more heavily on fees and fines. A study in North Carolina found that when state revenue was low, police would write more traffic tickets.

In Ferguson, Missouri, the Department of Justice found that the city raised municipal revenue in large part through frivolous fines and fees. These regressive fees and fines affect families of color at disproportionately higher rates, for two reasons.

One, people of color as mentioned before are more likely to be in a lower economic class, and thus the burden of paying fines such as traffic tickets is greater. Two, people of color are more likely to be stopped for traffic violations and are also more likely to be subjected to other payments such as court fees. Again in Ferguson as well as surrounding municipalities, the Department of Justice found that black motorists were stopped between 1.

Ultimately, the tax law reinforces and bolsters racial income and wealth gaps and subjects people of color to an increased number of regressive fees and fines. It maintains an economic system that benefits white America at the expense of people of color. Federal tax codes, along with other fiscal policies such as cuts to welfare spending, are 21st century tools for racial oppression.

To be socially liberal, fiscally conservative is to turn a blind eye to the undeniable relationship between economics and social justice. Featured Image Source: Libertarian Country. Disclaimer: The views published in this journal are those of the individual authors or speakers and do not necessarily reflect the position or policy of Berkeley Economic Review staff, the UC Berkeley Economics Department and faculty, or the University of California at Berkeley in general.

This article accuses others of logical fallacies, without pointing out one, while simultaneously committing several of its own. Everyone has to make decisions on competing values. There is no conflict in supporting changes to lift oppression on social groups while simultaneously wanting to be fiscally responsible.

LGBTQ marriage is a social concern, yeah, some bigoted cake shop owner not wanting to sell, still social. Does it impact the market?

Yeah sure kinda. Gays getting married impacts the market too. Unsurprisingly, the burden of these fees and fines disproportionately rests on those with lower incomes and higher rates of policing: people of color, specifically those who are Black and Latinx. Additionally, the estate tax cuts favor those with generational wealth in the United States: predominantly white people. Fiscal conservatism is incompatible with social liberalism.

Social liberalism implies a passionate support of social justice. On the other hand, supporting policies such as the aforementioned tax policy that exacerbate racial inequity in the United States works against racial justice. Another facet of conservative fiscal policy is reducing regulations on business.

However, business regulations such as Title VII, which prohibits employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex and national origin have been some of the greatest wins for social justice in the United States. As capitalism informs the majority of United States policy, fiscal and social policy are inevitably intertwined. I am also not an expert of economics or policy. I am an American who hopes to use my vote and my voice to help shape the United States that I want to live in one day.

The island has been under the control of the Imperial forces of both Spain and the Unites States and it has created unique geographies…. The morning that election was called, my parents shook me awake at AM to show me that Pennsylvania and Georgia had both flipped to blue that night…. It is no stretch to argue most Americans voted with domestic concerns in mind this November.

With the devastation of the COVID pandemic highlighting our failure to confront systemic racism, socioeconomic inequality, and climate crises, Americans….

Please, insert a valid email. Thank you, your email will be added to the mailing list once you click on the link in the confirmation email. Spam protection has stopped this request. Please contact site owner for help.